Textures

[sitters]

I redo the Japwall001 texture, If you like this style then I make more.




Willem

[DuKe2112]

It look great, but that strange beige area on the right wasn't intentional, was it?
Looks like you accidentaly applied the filler bucket.

[sitters]

It look great, but that strange beige area on the right wasn't intentional, was it?
Looks like you accidentaly applied the filler bucket.

I am sorry, but you see something I dont ?

[BTAxis]

I don't see it either.

[Mattn]

very nice job sitters - more of them please

[DuKe2112]

Ok, it is somewhat subtle and since you two didn't notice it, I suppose few people would, but I'm talking about the area I marked red.

It's completely filled with the exact same shade of beige/ocker(how do you call it?) as opposed to the other mountain, whioch is subtly textured.. Also the trees on that side are cropped because of this.
Looks exactly as if you applied a filler with some tollerance.

[RudolfoWood]

with this explanation I see it (so I don't see any red marker :-) )
for those who still search: right side the mountain, flowing into the lake

[sitters]

Ok, it is somewhat subtle and since you two didn't notice it, I suppose few people would, but I'm talking about the area I marked red.

It's completely filled with the exact same shade of beige/ocker(how do you call it?) as opposed to the other mountain, whioch is subtly textured.. Also the trees on that side are cropped because of this.
Looks exactly as if you applied a filler with some tollerance.

pfffttt... Now I see what you talking about, I'd did not blend the layer correct ( I fix this ).


Edit : this is better then ( refresh your page ).

Willem

[DuKe2112]

The red marker was on the pic I somehow failed to attach properly.

I know it's a minor detail, but for some reason I catch those imediately.
If I want to be nitpicking, I could say the trees on the right side still don't blend in as well as the left ones do, but that's realy overkill (;

[Mattn]

it would be cool if you could upload the source images, too

[sitters]

it would be cool if you could upload the source images, too

Yea , but they are C4D model files ( I model textures ).

Willem

[Psawhn]

Can you include things like the wood grain and the roughness of the canvas into the normal map, too? I think just including the basic geometry really underutilizes the power of bump mapping (and the ultimate goal is to eventually have a large set of high quality textures).

[Mattn]

Yea , but they are C4D model files ( I model textures ).

Willem

no problem - it would just be cool to have them. (as always )

[sitters]

Can you include things like the wood grain and the roughness of the canvas into the normal map, too? I think just including the basic geometry really underutilizes the power of bump mapping (and the ultimate goal is to eventually have a large set of high quality textures).

Yea I have update the pictures, but normally they use a bump high_map for small details.

willem

[Voller]

Thought I'd take a look at some of those non-licensed textures Mattn mentioned. I'm not exactly experienced, so I decided to start with something simple. Here's what I came up with for floor004. I kept the original size of 128x128, let me know if you'd like it in a higher resolution. I made this with MapZone, so changing the size is no problem at all.

I noticed there may be different standards for normal maps. MapZone offers two options: DirectX and OpenGL. The green channel is practically inverted. Anybody know any more about this?

The normal map I attached is using the same convention sitters has been using.



[attachment deleted by admin]