New board
In the tech proposal for antimatter, you write that antimatter has "...the best size-to-weight ratio of any material ...". Isn't that a bit meaningless? Maybe it should be "...the best energy-to-mass ratio of any material ...", like you say in the Antimatter Weaponry tech description? --Ouroboros
I agree that size-to-weight is not correct.Actually I see two ratios relevant for a material to be used as a fuel:volume-to-mass (=density) andenergy-to-mass.
It's not just weight/mass to energy. Think of gas. Volume is also important.@Kildor: Help !
Uhm...why not get away from those ratios ?What about "....the most efficient way to store energy...." ?