project-navigation
Personal tools

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Mooncalf

Pages: [1]
1
Hi,

i was trying to give the manual part of the wiki some love and wanted to upload some screenshots. I uploaded rather big png files (1 MB) instead of JPGs. (File:Manual_LOS1.png)

Maybe some1 with sysop rights may want to delete that.

Ah and btw i think a media category for screenshots to be used in the manual would be nice.

Thanks

Moony


2
Discussion / Issue with MG performance
« on: September 23, 2010, 08:44:08 am »
Hi folks,

I’ve got to say I love 2.3, great job!
I have a small issue with the ways my heavy fire support performs though, as explained below:

Assumption:

As I understand it every weapon has its specific purpose in the game. For machine guns and similar heavy fire support weapons the main purpose should be to provide suppressing fire, which in UFO is simulated by reaction fire.
As far as I know the current RF system, which is great (in theory ^^), compares the TU cost for my RF with the TUs spend by the enemy (I’m not sure about that, if that is not so, than please explain and disregard my post).

Problem:

The machine gun’s fastest mode of fire (5 shot burst) still needs a LOT of TUs. Therefore usually the enemy will walk into the MGs field of vision, shoot, walk back into cover and the MG won’t react. -> no suppression fire -> sad MG :(

Proposed Solution:

Quick and dirty (could be implemented with very little effort):
Give an additional mode of fire to MGs, some kind of snap shot with low TU cost, maybe a 2 or 3 shot burst. This solution has the major drawback of giving the MG a lot more mobility which gives it more versatility and therefore a less defined role (that’s bad).

Better solution (but more work):
Add a new mode of fire to every weapon which will exclusively be used for reaction fire. This new mode of fire may or may not be similar to the already existing modes of fire. For the MGs I’d propose a 3 shot burst for 8 TU’s cost. This would give the MG great suppression fire while maintaining it’s more stationary role. And I think this would benefit the other weapons as well. For example I think assault guns feel way more assault gunish  if they shoot short burst for RF.

Please let me know what you think. And thanks for your time.

Moony

Pages: [1]