UFO:Alien Invasion

Technical support => Feature Requests => Topic started by: Jonny on September 05, 2006, 01:33:33 pm

Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Jonny on September 05, 2006, 01:33:33 pm
Hi ufo-people,

big thanks for that game, it gave me some entertaining hours. Here some errors i found (sorry sometimes i don't use the original descriptions/terms, i'm playing the German version):


Possible game errors:

[list=1]

Both planes are equipped, manned & fuelled.
new: I tried to investigate the problem further: I demanned the team-carrier and i wanted to chose the interceptor to start a (terror) mission, but there is written i have to sign a team to the ship (the interceptor is equipped with 1 guy).
Then i tried to put 2 soldiers to the team carrier but chosed the interceptor to start the terror mission. Now it works, but when the mission starts i have the 2 soldiers i signed to the carrier. It seems no matter what i chose the carrier is chosen anyway.

Other Info:

Game Version: RC4 / WindowsXP
Players PC: Athlon Thunderbird 1400 / 512 MB RAM
Players hair color: blonde


Thanks again for your great job, i hope you'll keep on!
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: ubequitz on September 05, 2006, 04:32:35 pm
Thanks for the bug reports and questions.

Issue 1 you identified is fixed in the current development version. I suspect issue 2 is as well but this would need testing (since I know that a very closely related bug was fixed which I believe would also fix this).

Issue 3 looks like a bug which is likely to still be present in the development version... I will investigate.

Issues 4 & 5 I'm not sure about. Both those maps have undergone heavy bugfixing since RC4 though.

The items that you collect on missions are meant to go to the marketplace for purchase. After a mission you should notice that you are awarded the value of those weapons.. so buying them back is essentially free. It might be better if the weapons went into storage and then you could sell them... but this could get annoying after a while (you would have to manualle sell a bunch of things after every missio to get money).

Your artifiact salvage stat screen is a great idea. Hopefully we can implement something like this.

I agree with you that more standard equipment should be available at the start of the game for purchase.
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Jonny on September 05, 2006, 11:11:15 pm
Hi ubequitz,

thanks for your reply and help.

The idea to sell all items automaticly is great and comfortable for me, even if its confusing just in the first moment. The game gives such a fantastic X-Com feeling that even small differences should be more evident (i.e. with salvage stat screen you could give a hint what will happen with the items the players just collected).

I tried different things to bypass problem number #2. One of them was to build a second base with a new interceptor. But it didn't help. The second interceptor is signed to the first base (hq), even if it should be impossible (there is just 1 interceptor hangar in hq).
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Bandobras on September 06, 2006, 06:24:43 am
Thank you for the reports and analysis. Is the scarcity of human weapons at the beginning fun or woe? Is the problem that  it's different from XCom, or is the problem elsewhere? How quickly should the human weapons and ammo be available in great quantities (currently it's probably a month or two into the game)? Does the ammo scarcity lead to trying out all weapons and fun or to nervousness and trying to spare each shot? Would an explanation at the game start, that ammo will be more and more plentiful as the base organization is getting better, resolve the anxiety?
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Jonny on September 06, 2006, 01:13:27 pm
Hi Bandobras,

the scarcity of human weapons isn't a gameplay problem, the player is more or less forced to use most types of weapons avaible, which is good. Using them he discovers the fun of the lesser usual weapons as the flamethrower i.e.. I can talk just for myself: I don't spare any shot in the game (except from far range shootings) - when there is an alien to shoot, i'm going after it (isn't that the fun of the game?).

But besides this its a question of logic: Why shouldn't an organization like Phalanx (its military, isn't it?) be able to buy more than 5 rifles? The answer could be high bureaucracy inside the organization. ;)

An idea could be to have all human weapons avaible in high numbers from the beginning, but when the player tries to buy more than a few, there could be a message like "You reached the yearly weopon limit given by the government".

Quote
[...] Is the problem that it's different from XCom? [...]


In my opinion ufoai is as much as the X-Com games as it should be, i like the new ideas and details. Important is the basis analogy as the world screen, the base managment, the tactical missions and the atmosphere.
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Bandobras on September 06, 2006, 03:48:04 pm
Yeah, I'm currently looking for a believable excuse of the weapon shortage. I'm not good at believable stuff, though. :) But, as the base is starting to operate after a long time of being (nearly) abandoned, Phalanx is just starting up, UN is just starting to supervise any miliary program after decades and wars are almost forgotten, excuses should not be hard to find, without even employing any plot twists for them... It all depends on whether any better initial equipment game-balance can be found and if not, whether the storyline guys will agree to cope with this particular balance...
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Jonny on September 06, 2006, 06:54:52 pm
What of this:

The world is in peace united as one nation, so who needs guns? The restrictions are high and so are the prices to get weapons in big numbers (just the first few Phalanx guns are sponsored by the UN itself).
I image the situation as in "Demolition Man", all cops running around with phasers, giving tickets for swearing in public.

... or all weapon dealers got stoned to death by amnesty international.

... or all the people in the world got superstitious and threw the guns into the ocean, singing a childish rhyme.

... or the leaders of the UN are highly religious gurus who don't allow people to use things in the color of grey, black or silver (its the comeback of goldfinger then ... yeah ;) )
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Bandobras on September 07, 2006, 01:33:27 am
Hehe. But we have to stick to the official backstory, see the wiki for the finished nations writeup (more will come later). I may be wrong, but probably the intro sequences on the wiki are from the final version, too. It seems soldiers are still walking Earth, even if there are no more wars...
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Jonny on September 07, 2006, 12:12:34 pm
From what i read in the the wiki (in General -> Storyline), there is nothing written wether the rest of the world is armed or not.


While i continued to play, i had 2 new errors:

Screenshot (http://mitglied.lycos.de/lqw/moz-screenshot.jpg)

Some other small suggestions:

Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 07, 2006, 03:47:47 pm
Hi. I am playing RC4. It's February 23rd, i completed 14 missions and now my base is under attack. I started the mission, killed all the aliens (with no losses to my guys), but still when i enter the base screen, it says "the base is under attack". is this a well-known bug?
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 07, 2006, 09:04:27 pm
I looked through the code (that came with RC4) and the only cases of setting baseStatus are either BASE_UNDER_ATTACK or BASE_NOT_USED. Shouldn't baseStatus be set to something normal if base attack is defeated?
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: ubequitz on September 08, 2006, 01:32:33 am
The base status never being reset bug is fixed in the SVN version (thanks for dropping by on IRC BTW, and for planning to test SVN for us!).
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 08, 2006, 07:55:23 pm
I downloaded everything, rebuilt everything with DevCpp, even managed to start the game. but when I wen to the first mission, it complained about not finding the map. So, now I am recompiling the maps. Will let you know how it goes.

Another thing I noticed. Aliens get tougher with each mission, right? But your equipment gets better only with time, because you have to research things to be able to use them. Or is this not correct impression?
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Bandobras on September 08, 2006, 09:30:46 pm
Quote from: "dimon37"
Aliens get tougher with each mission, right? But your equipment gets better only with time, because you have to research things to be able to use them.


Yes, this is a race between you and aliens. This is why I badly need testing to know what should the intervals between missions be, etc.
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 11, 2006, 04:26:53 pm
ok, it's January 27th and i just got my 6th mission. All 6 initial scientists are working on Advanced Plasma control still. We'll see how soon i can get Tachion Control and research Tachion sniper rifle :-)
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Bandobras on September 11, 2006, 07:31:10 pm
BTW, do you play in latest SVN (branch, preferable, because it's supposed to be stable)? There were major balance tweaks...
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 11, 2006, 10:21:45 pm
Yes, I play SVN version (last updated last Thursday)
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 11, 2006, 10:23:40 pm
my main problem is "No free inventory space!" error. I'll see if I can figure out how to fix/circumvent it.
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: v29a on September 11, 2006, 11:33:48 pm
from now on i will provide xdelta patches for win32 again.
seems to me we need more bughunters now ;-)
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 12, 2006, 12:08:21 am
Question about recompiling the maps. Does the compile.pl script take into account if the map file is newer then the bsp file?
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Bandobras on September 12, 2006, 12:51:15 am
Quote from: "dimon37"
my main problem is "No free inventory space!" error. I'll see if I can figure out how to fix/circumvent it.


ubequitz is working on it currently, but it's very tricky. You can ask about all this on the IRC and perhaps then fixing will be easier... An easy way of circumventing the bug is changing

Code: [Select]
./game/q_shared.h:#define MAX_INVLIST           1024

to something much larger (there is essentially a leak of the MAX_INVLIST items in the code). I've not tried that, however. I you try, please report how it works...

BTW if we don't manage to fix it for RC5 it might be a very idea to increase this constant, say 100 times...
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 12, 2006, 04:56:18 pm
New error.
Not sure if it's just the display or more serious problem.
I complete 2 missions. both won. However on the statistics screen it show that I won 2, lost 1 and built 3 bases ( i built just a single one)
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 12, 2006, 08:43:15 pm
yet another problem - SZ_GetSpace: overflow
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Bandobras on September 13, 2006, 12:36:56 am
Quote from: "dimon37"
New error.
Not sure if it's just the display or more serious problem.
I complete 2 missions. both won. However on the statistics screen it show that I won 2, lost 1 and built 3 bases ( i built just a single one)


SVN trunk? Which version? Is reproducible with "killteam 7" on the console, instead of killing all the aliens?
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 13, 2006, 02:10:36 am
SVN trunk, i think. last updated on Monday.
what is killteam 7? it's the command that I can give to artificialy win a scenario?
I'll start a new game to test this.
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: dimon37 on September 13, 2006, 09:37:01 pm
About the number of lost mission san sbuilt bases.
It looks like it's not afecting the gameplay. I haven't tested with a new game yet, but so far i have almost all countries Pleased with me, 2 are Happy and Oceania is the only one Cpntent.
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: ubequitz on September 14, 2006, 08:25:13 am
I have seen the number of bases > 1 issue before, but I have no idea how to reliably reproduce it (although I haven't tried all that hard).

The SZ_GetSpace: overflow bug sounds familiar too but again it is one of the ultra-rare things (as far I can tell). If you encounter it again more details about it would be great.
Title: Possible Errors in RC4
Post by: Mephisto on September 14, 2006, 04:38:01 pm
Another issue:

everytime I complete a mission (base-attack or standard) after reaching state3 (the invasion begins) the game crashes.

I'm using SVN-3530 "Bandobras Edition" (;)) on Win32 but this happened in 3490, too

(yes, I uninstalled and reinstalled)
Title: Possible bugs on RC4
Post by: Superone on September 14, 2006, 07:56:35 pm
Good evening, I've been a great X-Com fan since it's begining and I believe your effort is great and deserves all we can offer (even if it is bug testing)

So far I've encountered two bugs. One already mentioned (research set at 0% at game loading) and the second one:

*When I put the IR googles on a soldier in the aircraft equipment screen an error pops out in windows to debug:
-if you hit cancel, game crashes
-if you hit debug, I don't know how to debug
-if you hit ignore, It keeps on popping until you go back to the game but you can no longer select that soldier as the error will pop back.

I tried this twice and always the same.

Good luck and great work