UFO:Alien Invasion

General => Discussion => Topic started by: homunculus on December 14, 2011, 05:37:29 am

Title: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on December 14, 2011, 05:37:29 am
Wanted to clarify a few things about some weapons and aircraft, and therefore read some mail, and noticed again that the texts are verbose and useful info is not very clearly accessible.

So I got a little wicked and tried out how many lines of text are needed to tell me that something is a storage facility (http://ufoai.ninex.info/wiki/index.php/Base_Facilities/Storage).
Quite a few, it seems, though it might suit the ufo:ai style.

The heading looked like an official letter and that was fine, but in the body tiny details like this attracted a lot of attention (= a LOT):
"Live ammunition and other sensitive equipment such as alien artifacts are kept in locked containers in the quartermaster's office behind rigorous security; checking anything out of locked storage requires the presence of the base quartermaster and written authorisation from the Command Centre."
The security being rigorous or not rigorous depends on the context.
The security being rigorous is Marcel LeClerc's personal opinion.
Perhaps he is trying to tell me that in his opinion the security is too rigorous for PHALANX base storage and we should relax more instead, maybe even treat it as a junk yard?

Even if the storage facility text absolutely has to be that much verbose, in an official letter I would expect item categories and associated security standards (id and name), and it better be formatted as a list or else Maj. LeClerc might be in trouble.
Maybe it is specific to the place where I live (although I very much doubt that), but I do not think a base commander would be interested in Marcel's personal opinions, like a letter to mom (trying to convey the attitude of myself as a player reading it).
Even just without the "behind rigorous security" part:
"Live ammunition and other sensitive equipment such as alien artifacts are kept in locked containers in the quartermaster's office; checking anything out of locked storage requires the presence of the base quartermaster and written authorisation from the Command Centre."
This is, of course, just one example of such detail in this text which looks like it is supposed to be an official letter, and this text is just one example of of the ufopaedia texts that are written with similar attitude.

On the other hand, it might clarify that dead aliens are not stored in the storage facility (as opposed to many ufo games).
It does say "ammunition, weapons, and other equipment", but there is motivation to store a dead alien in the storage and I doubt that, say, in court, a fridge or a dry ice box that accidentally contains a dead alien would not qualify as "other equipment".
That is probably not necessary from the "official letter about storage facility" point of view, but is "relevant information for the player".
If the text was a clear list of item categories without this "other equipment", the explicit clarification about alien stiffs would not be needed (terminology like "personal combat equipment" comes to mind).

By the way, I am not saying that the storage facility text should be rewritten or anything the like.
What I am saying is that there are such kind of issues with the texts.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Jon_dArc on December 14, 2011, 03:43:45 pm
Wanted to clarify a few things about some weapons and aircraft, and therefore read some mail, and noticed again that the texts are verbose and useful info is not very clearly accessible.

So I got a little wicked and tried out how many lines of text are needed to tell me that something is a storage facility (http://ufoai.ninex.info/wiki/index.php/Base_Facilities/Storage).
While I agree that the UFOPaedia texts have serious style and content issues, this isn't a particularly good example—it takes all of one line of text to tell us that it's a storage facility (less if you count the name). Admittedly that's preceded by a bit over a half-dozen lines of administrative debris, but that's all in the form of an email header that the eye quickly skips over—on my machine, the relevant information appears without scrolling (though if there's reason to believe that a meaningful portion of the playerbase uses a significantly lower resolution that might be an issue). Nearly everything else is just flavourtext.

Quote
"Live ammunition and other sensitive equipment such as alien artifacts are kept in locked containers in the quartermaster's office behind rigorous security; checking anything out of locked storage requires the presence of the base quartermaster and written authorisation from the Command Centre."
The security being rigorous or not rigorous depends on the context.
The security being rigorous is Marcel LeClerc's personal opinion.
Perhaps he is trying to tell me that in his opinion the security is too rigorous for PHALANX base storage and we should relax more instead, maybe even treat it as a junk yard?
It is dependent on the context, but the context is assumed—it's Marcel LeClerc's opinion in his capacity as Base Commander of Pacific Operations Command.

More problematic from my view is that the UFOPaedia description is at odds with the base tile as shown overhead and in base attack maps (security? Where?), or the fact that only certain kinds of people take up living quarters (where did this quartermaster appear from?), but this is pretty nitpicky.

Quote
Even if the storage facility text absolutely has to be that much verbose
I think what you're digging towards is a deeper issue about how the UFOpaedia descriptions serve two orthogonal roles—they provide (or ought to) important gameplay information on the one hand, which should be done concisely and scannably, and on the other they serve as flavourtext for atmosphere-building and player entertainment.

Quote
in an official letter I would expect item categories and associated security standards (id and name), and it better be formatted as a list or else Maj. LeClerc might be in trouble.
Maybe it is specific to the place where I live (although I very much doubt that), but I do not think a base commander would be interested in Marcel's personal opinions, like a letter to mom (trying to convey the attitude of myself as a player reading it).
Even just without the "behind rigorous security" part:
"Live ammunition and other sensitive equipment such as alien artifacts are kept in locked containers in the quartermaster's office; checking anything out of locked storage requires the presence of the base quartermaster and written authorisation from the Command Centre."
This is, of course, just one example of such detail in this text which looks like it is supposed to be an official letter, and this text is just one example of of the ufopaedia texts that are written with similar attitude.
I think here again the deeper issue is that all UFOpaedia articles are structured as direct reports from persons of significance in PHALANX; descriptions of routine installations, procedures, and equipment read strangely in that context (note especially the articles on, say, the Combat Knife or most other equipment available at the start of the game).

At least the storage facility article doesn't outright lie to the player, as the Small Hanger article does by claiming to be an entry point during base invasions.

~J
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on December 15, 2011, 05:26:02 pm
Suppose a player wants to find some info about a facility, or whatever other item.
Usually there is nowhere else to go for the info except ufopaedia.
What the player finds there, however, is pages and pages (about half a page for each item) of flavor text that is supposed to drive the players imagination (original x-com did the same, but the texts were way shorter).
So, the player gets a wicked attitude about it and nitpicks on a word here and there.
And, just for this very simple reason, a player like myself is not on the same side as the writer of those texts, and rather than accomplishing the flavor purpose it accomplishes some rolleyes emotes instead.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Vassilios de Veritas on December 20, 2011, 07:23:36 pm
Oh people, don't remind me about Storage Facility description text. Some time ago i was actively translating msg_ids to Ukrainian, but that description... that description had broken my mind, bros. It's a storage facility. A warehouse. You keep things there. How many words do you need to describe a warehouse, to show that it is, in fact, a warehouse and not a space station? I don't know, maybe it was fatigue from translating the whole Story and Buildings sections, but every time i was trying to translate Storage Facility article, i couldn't find words to stretch sentence "this is a warehouse, you keep things there" through three paragraphs + Addendum ("it's bad when aliens are in your warehouse, duh").
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on December 27, 2011, 07:10:29 am
It's a storage facility. A warehouse. You keep things there.
I sympathize with you, tried some translating also, a few years ago.

I hope reading a real world Arms Room SOP (standard operating procedure) (http://www.armystudyguide.com/content/useful_files/SOPs_Policy_Letters/arms-room-sop-2.shtml) will make the storage facility translation feel like a breeze :)
A far as my personal opinion goes, this text (or better, a stricter one of the same type) could be customized in full extent to ufo:ai for the storage facility, if such keyboard-happy writer can be found (because, as said, the storage facility text was read out of wickedness).
Or it could mock some lengthy license agreement, GPL maybe (well, GPL is not that long, but would be close to educative at least).
Or it could say that the holy scrolls with the warehouse standards were lost, and until they are found the base commander can feel free to read GPL.

However, the translatable part of it might clarify some things:
1) aircraft equipment storage.
2) alien artifacts storage.
3) alien stiffs storage (especially as it contradicts other ufo games).
4) equipment in use by soldiers (I have accidentally sold equips worn by soldiers and discovered my soldier without a gun or ammo at the battlefield. But afaik player cannot sell, say, installed aircraft weapons, dunno about aircraft ammunition loaded in those).
5) in the future, probably also UGV storage.
6) items being researched in the lab (again, this has happened in game, sold alien medium armor; afair, the research screen looked strange before I started the time).
7) the meaning of storage capacity in practical playing, so that the player would understand how much he can really store, and if he would need to build a second one.
8 ) I doubt anyone would try to store an aircraft or a small UFO (or parts of a broken one) in storage facility, but who knows...

What comes to mind first, I would really suggest to try improving texts about
1) flasbang.
2) smoke grenade.
3) effect of weapon spread and soldiers weapon skill on bullet hole distribution in the target, maybe even include some sample images of shot targets as documentation (havn't read it, which means I would have needed to dig for it, and it is very likely that it is bit vague (me pessimistic about it)).
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: TrashMan on December 31, 2011, 01:41:29 pm
That bothers you?
I'm more bothered by the assault rifle being caseless, despite having a huge magazine size-wise and holding only 30 bullets, and similar things that look conflicting.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on December 31, 2011, 05:01:48 pm
in that case, shouldn't i be more bothered about deuterium poisoning that the phalanx scientists are talking about?

if i need to find and read base/ufos/weapons.ufo to get any useful info about a smoke grenade, will i be extremely cheerful about it?
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Vassilios de Veritas on January 05, 2012, 09:16:35 pm
Quote
1) aircraft equipment storage.
2) alien artifacts storage.
3) alien stiffs storage (especially as it contradicts other ufo games).
4) equipment in use by soldiers (I have accidentally sold equips worn by soldiers and discovered my soldier without a gun or ammo at the battlefield. But afaik player cannot sell, say, installed aircraft weapons, dunno about aircraft ammunition loaded in those).
5) in the future, probably also UGV storage.
6) items being researched in the lab (again, this has happened in game, sold alien medium armor; afair, the research screen looked strange before I started the time).
7) the meaning of storage capacity in practical playing, so that the player would understand how much he can really store, and if he would need to build a second one.
All of those things are.. things. And when you store them... you do it in some place. For example, in a house. Storehouse. Haha. Really basic concept, you don't need a lot words to describe it because everything is obvious from the name.
As for the "i have accidentally sold EVERYTHING, GIBE MONEY PLEASE"... well, that's bad game design or technical problem, player should receive notification when he tries to sell something that's being used. Has no relation to description of a warehouse. That place where you store things.
Quote
I hope reading a real world Arms Room SOP (standard operating procedure)
Emmm, what? Storage facility (http://ufoai.ninex.info/wiki/index.php/Base_Facilities/Storage) is a description of a warehouse for a video game, that text in your link is a description of standard operating procedures for arms room in a real military. I don't see the connection. In fact, there should be no connection, if we want to make a fun game.
Anyway, i looked at the storage facility text again, and now i understand that it was my fatigue, and now i'm ready to translate it, do it like it's my job, you know. However, the text is dull and uninteresting, and i will not have fun while doing it. And when, if, player will be reading that description, he will feel the same.

Quote
MESSAGE FROM: Surgeon-Captain Helen Floydd, Medical Division, PHALANX, Atlantic Operations Command
MESSAGE SUBJECT: Commander, do you feel fine?
Executive Officer Howard told me you sent him an email, with a request to describe you our storage facility. He asked me to perform this task.
Well you see, commander, when people don't use things, those things usually just don't move (aka "lay around"). However (and this is important part, read carefully), some things go BOOM when you accidentally hit them or leak radiation and alien substances, so it is better if those things lay around in some safe places. Preferably, places with walls, just like room or house. In our civil life, we call those places a warehouse, a storage room, or a storeroom. But since this is military, we call it a storage facility. We are having fun, and so should you!

Commander, if you feel yourself tired or depressed, come visit me ASAP, there is nothing to be ashamed of in alcoholism. With care, doctor Helen.

Also,
Quote
In the case of an invasion, we will need all the storage space we can get. Large stores of ammunition may need to be squared away for long periods of time.
JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE, THE ALIENS ARE AT THE DOOR, GRAB THE ALL STORAGE SPACE YOU "CAN GET", FIGHT FOR IT IF YOU MUST, AND STORE THOSE HUGE PILES OF AMMUNITION THAT WERE LAYING OUTSIDE THE STORAGE FACILITY FOR SOME REASON EVEN THO THAT'S THE ONLY PLACE WHERE WE STORE IT, CAUSE WE TOTALLY GONNA FIGHT THOSE ALIENS WITH OUR GUNS THAT REQUIRE AMMUNITION!!! GOD BLESS HUMANITY AND OUR RIGHT TO GET ALL THE STORAGE SPACE WE CAN WHILE UNDER ALIEN INVASION!!!
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Hertzila on January 07, 2012, 12:13:45 am
All of those things are.. things. And when you store them... you do it in some place. For example, in a house. Storehouse. Haha. Really basic concept, you don't need a lot words to describe it because everything is obvious from the name.

Objection!
The concept is basic but what about tactical information? Many games tend to display pretty much any military storage facility or container as full of nitroglyserin ready to go off with a first bullet. Would you have guessed that a storage facility is a low priority target and the player could unload a whole clip of grenades without worrying too much?

Emmm, what? Storage facility (http://ufoai.ninex.info/wiki/index.php/Base_Facilities/Storage) is a description of a warehouse for a video game, that text in your link is a description of standard operating procedures for arms room in a real military. I don't see the connection. In fact, there should be no connection, if we want to make a fun game.

Objection!
Hard sci-fi (the genre UFO:AI is intended to be) usually means that stuff is kept as realistic as possible to ground the game into reality, while keeping the intended story possible. In other words, there could, if not should, very well be a connection between the two texts, since the in-game description is more or less the fictional counterpart of the real life SOP.

*quote*
JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE, THE ALIENS ARE AT THE DOOR, GRAB THE ALL STORAGE SPACE YOU "CAN GET", FIGHT FOR IT IF YOU MUST, AND STORE THOSE HUGE PILES OF AMMUNITION THAT WERE LAYING OUTSIDE THE STORAGE FACILITY FOR SOME REASON EVEN THO THAT'S THE ONLY PLACE WHERE WE STORE IT, CAUSE WE TOTALLY GONNA FIGHT THOSE ALIENS WITH OUR GUNS THAT REQUIRE AMMUNITION!!! GOD BLESS HUMANITY AND OUR RIGHT TO GET ALL THE STORAGE SPACE WE CAN WHILE UNDER ALIEN INVASION!!!

Hold it!
(Okay I stop using these. I've been playing Ace Attorney a bit too much.)
You do realize that the text reminds/means that the player should keep enough storages around so they won't run out of space when stockpiling supplies? Right now it's not that much of problem, since deliveries are instantaneous, but in the future buying stuff is supposed to happen with delays, so buying more ammo at the last minute won't cut it.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Vassilios de Veritas on January 07, 2012, 01:52:01 am
Just finished translating the text, gonna post some feedback tomorrow or in couple of days.
Quote
Would you have guessed that a storage facility is a low priority target and the player could unload a whole clip of grenades without worrying too much?
Of course. Storage facility is a room. Walls usually do not explode or leak radiation. Containers with explosives or plutonium do. You can put those anywhere, not just a storage facility. Which is a room.

I'm not sure that "hard sci-fi" is a genre of video games. Besides, i don't think that description of "normal", casual things and activities is what science fiction is all about. Storing things in a room is not a sci-fi, alien artifacts are but not the process of storing things. But i'll talk about "casual and fascinating" in my feedback a bit later.
Quote
You do realize that the text reminds/means that the player should keep enough storages around so they won't run out of space when stockpiling supplies?
Why are you so sure that player will suddenly forget such trivial thing? Base management is not a deep process, it's kinda hard to forget to buy/sell things if  buying/selling them is like 1/4 of all operations related to base management. What are those, besides base building? Research, production, transfer (if there is a second base), market. And you don't need to read about those operations in encyclopedia, especially in the section about buildings, to perform them. Again, its a bad game design if player have to search info about such basic game actions in encyclopedia. Also, i'm not suppose to realize that, it must be obvious from text. And that part  says something about invasion, not your usual schedOH MAN WAIT A SECOND, i just realized it's from 50s, when they were only preparing for encounter. What that part with invasion is about, invasion on Earth or base? Oh man im tired, i'll go to bed.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on January 07, 2012, 07:55:13 am
i have worked in (what i think would qualify as) a middle-sized furniture factory for a two months, enough to be somewhat disillusioned about the level of organization in such places, including the warehouse (= it is quite high).

I do agree that the base commander should not be lectured daily about the diameter of wire that is used for key rings, and how often those need to be replaced.
that is why i would prefer just a mention of some warehouse standard id and name for flavor reasons, but i would prefer it nevertheless because it is an arms room rather than an old maid's attic.
...
the problem that i see with this rewrite is that...

maybe the player is wondering if he would need to build a second warehouse in, say, a disassembly base?
maybe the player would need to compromise a workshop or a hangar for that?
how is the storage space calculated for an item, and what items are stored, suddenly becomes somewhat relevant.

if a player is reading the storage facility text out of good will, the player probably wants to know something, and you are telling the player to gtfo.

the layout of this particular text does not help to find the info someone might be looking for, and after reading the long text it turns out that the info isn't even there.

your attitude about warehouses, however, is unrealistic in my opinion.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Vassilios de Veritas on January 08, 2012, 08:06:55 pm
Quote
The Storage facility is the base's repository for ammunition, weapons, and other equipment not currently in use. All small-arms, vehicle and aircraft ammunition that is not earmarked for emergency response resides in the Storage facility.
Tautology.
Quote
Live ammunition and other sensitive equipment such as alien artifacts are kept in locked containers in the quartermaster's office behind rigorous security; checking anything out of locked storage requires the presence of the base quartermaster and written authorisation from the Command Centre.
So ammunition and alien artifacts have same value and importance? So when mission starts, bunch of people run into the quartermaster's office and start grabbing the piles of ammunition, or a forklift rides in? And while all this happening, poor quartermaster just sits behind his desk?
Quote
The Storage facility can fit a maximum of 50 standard-sized pallets of equipment. The amount of items in a pallet is relatively unimportant, size is the main restricting factor with regards to Storage facility space. The contents of each individual pallet are scrupulously tracked by magnetic labels and detailed punch-card logs.
Magnetic labels and punch-card logs. Things are scrupulously tracked. Fascinating, considering that if you don't watch for things, you lose them. Just like if you don't close the door, someone or something can freely walk in and/or walk out. If a room can't store things, you don't call it a storeroom, and if a room can't elevate things higher you don't call it an elevator.
All of this is not hard military sci-fi, it is common sense. You know why text has this problem? Because there is not much you can say about warehouse, even if it's a military facility, there is no "recommended doctrine" for warehouses. You don't need to describe standard operating procedures to tell player what storage facility does. Especially if those sop are common sense everyday non-sci-fi activities.
Idea with pallets is a nice explanation of what is storage space in UFO: AI. 1 pallet = 1 unit of space, am i right?
Quote
i have worked in (what i think would qualify as) a middle-sized furniture factory for a two months, enough to be somewhat disillusioned about the level of organization in such places, including the warehouse (= it is quite high).
I never argued about that, so... My school also had high level of organization, but reading all the rules was not an entertaining gameplay. :)
Quote
In the case of an invasion, we will need all the storage space we can get. Large stores of ammunition may need to be squared away for long periods of time.
I don't get this part. First of all, since when storage space is an important part in war, any war? Ammo, guns, resources, yes. But storage space? Empty space under a roof? This is ridiculous. Secondly, if this part of the text is about invasion, then why would you need to store ammo for long period of time when you need it to fight off the previously mentioned invasion? And where were ammo piles before invasion if the need to store them appears only during invasion?

Quote
During a base attack, the Storage facility would not be more than a target of opportunity. Any sensitive equipment in the facility will most likely be protected and require significant effort to destroy. Even the facility itself is cheap and easy to repair. The only threat comes from stored explosives and ammunition, which may present a risk due to the possibility of sympathetic detonation.

Still, any extraterrestrials are unlikely to spend the time and effort getting into our explosion-proof lockers when there are easier targets nearby.

Oh, so the storage facility is totally not important, and the only danger is our own rockets and 'nades. This part renders most of text above it pointless, but it's actually the most correct one. Because storage facility is a place where you store things.

I would also like to point, that in-game encyclopedia is not the only place where player will receive information concerning the storage facility. There are also gameplay information and graphical representation. Gameplay information player will receive when he'll start interacting with storage facility. What will it be?

You can't store things without a storage facility, so if you want to store things on a base you need to have it there.
Storage facility has limited storage space. If it runs out, build another one or transfer to other base.

Now lets look at graphical representation:
(http://ufoai.ninex.info/wiki/images/Storage.png)
Shelves and cardboard boxes, some of them are open. Space, the final frontier and all that. I can imagine a slightly obese middle-aged quartermaster sitting behind that desk in lower-right corner playing solitaire and drinking coffee. Seriously tho, i'm sure that shelves and boxes, not mandatory cardboard, are what people imagine when they think of place where you store things.
Quote
the problem that i see with this rewrite is that...
That was just a joke. :D But yeah, here's my try:

Quote
The Storage facility is the base's repository for ammunition, weapons, and other equipment not currently in use, and it also serves as a garage for our battlefield vehicles. These remain in their bays until mission time, with fully-loaded magazines in case of a base attack.
Objects are being stored on pallets, and the Storage facility can fit a maximum of 50 standard-sized pallets of equipment. The amount of items in a pallet is relatively unimportant, size is the main restricting factor with regards to Storage facility space.

Recommended Doctrine
During a base attack, the Storage facility would not be more than a target of opportunity. Any sensitive equipment in the facility will most likely be protected and require significant effort to destroy. Even the facility itself is cheap and easy to repair.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on January 08, 2012, 10:32:27 pm
Ok, I see you wanted a fun text previously, while I was thinking more about how it would fit in with the formal heading.

Here's my preference for readability (though my formal English in not excellent):
Quote
Overview
The Storage facility is the base's repository for ammunition, weapons, and other equipment not currently in use, and a garage for battlefield vehicles.

Items
Soldier equipment (including assigned equipment and ammunition)
Ground Vehicles (not including assigned ammunition)
Aircraft equipment (not including assigned equipment and ammunition)
Alien artifacts (including items researched in lab; not including corpses and robots)
Capacity
50 standard-sized pallets.
Dependencies
Does not depend upon any other base facilities to function.

Recommended Doctrine
A dedicated production base may require two Storage facilities to keep production running smoothly.
During a base attack, the Storage facility would not be more than a target of opportunity. Sensitive equipment is stored in explosion-proof lockers. Storage facility is cheap and easy to repair.

Attachments
Standard Operating Procedure OD-1I3E5S-2653-145-816-5653-5U28-8989 Arms Room SOP (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html) (level Blue)
Of course, the game must not try to present GPL as an arms room sop, but might present is as a generic formal text.

Up to this day I have not figured out how the storage space works, except for looking at available storage space changes when I buy/sell things.

As far as I understand (and it will sound rude, but it is practical, so please don't take it personally), a good way it identify places in text that might need some attention is to try to say it and pay attention to the feeling of mouth full of porridge without much gain:
Quote
[...] equipment not currently in use, and it also serves as a garage for our battlefield vehicles. [...]
I would replace it with:
Quote
[...] equipment not currently in use, and a garage for battlefield vehicles. [...]
Especially considering that I think your version was great progress.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Vassilios de Veritas on January 09, 2012, 01:09:52 am
Quote
I would replace it with:
Oh, i didn't pay much attention to that, just copy-pasted chunks from original.  :)
Honestly, this thread is really random for me. Just like i said in my first post here, it just made me recall that text and problems i had when i was working on translation. I also didn't try to make it more funny or formal, just point out some problems that would not make any text better and problems that definitely wouldn't make any video game entertaining.

Quote
Items
Soldier equipment (including assigned equipment and ammunition)
Ground Vehicles (not including assigned ammunition)
Aircraft equipment (not including assigned equipment and ammunition)
Alien artifacts (including items researched in lab; not including corpses and robots)
Emm, including-not including parts look ugly, too repetitive and long.
Quote
Up to this day I have not figured out how the storage space works, except for looking at available storage space changes when I buy/sell things.
Uhm, so maybe we need additional counter with available/occupied storage space?
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on January 09, 2012, 08:19:19 am
Oh, don't worry, I am regularly puzzled about why I didn't create this thread in offtopic section, just to rant and nitpick on this low-priority text.

To my knowledge, repetitiveness is not necessarily a bad thing in such list.
Especially as it is meant to be skipped over if the reader is not interested in stored item types.
But it does look ugly, any better ideas how the same info could be said in a different way?

If I understood you correctly, there already is such counter.
Didn't check again, but I think the items take up different storage space, and the thing I have not understood is the logic behind it (I don't mean common sense logic, I mean the rules).
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: TrashMan on January 09, 2012, 12:43:02 pm
Being a bit..anal..aren't we?

Descriptions give flavor. You complain the Storage description is too long? Bah.

If anything, the base model could use an update.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Vassilios de Veritas on January 09, 2012, 03:10:55 pm
Quote
Being a bit..anal..aren't we?
Oh boy, here we go. What's next, "U MAD BRO?"?
Quote
Descriptions give flavor.
Nobody argued about that, i personally pointed out problems in one particular text.
Quote
You complain the Storage description is too long?
No. I complain [link to my huge post, with no complains about size].

Quote
But it does look ugly, any better ideas how the same info could be said in a different way?
Quote
The Storage facility is the base's repository for ammunition, weapons, and other equipment not currently in use, and a garage for battlefield vehicles. These remain in their bays until mission time, with fully-loaded magazines in case of a base attack.
Objects are being stored on pallets, and the Storage facility can fit a maximum of 50 standard-sized pallets of equipment. The amount of items in a pallet is relatively unimportant, size is the main restricting factor with regards to Storage facility space. A dedicated production base may require two Storage facilities to keep production running smoothly. Please note Commander, that all equipment used by soldiers, and all items needed for research and production are also being stored in this facility.

Recommended Doctrine
During a base attack, the Storage facility would not be more than a target of opportunity. Any sensitive equipment in the facility will most likely be protected and require significant effort to destroy. Facility does not depend upon any other base facilities to function, and is cheap and easy to repair.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on January 09, 2012, 10:21:16 pm
I see.
If I was a base commander, though, all e-mails sent to me would need to have the following format.
So that I would not need to read every word of the blob to find out just one little fact somewhere in the middle of it.
And that would mean NO fiction-writing artistic freedom for the sender of the e-mail.
Quote
What?
Plastic cup
For whom?
Mom
Purpose
Storing scissors
Solves problem of
Scissors being lost
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Vassilios de Veritas on January 09, 2012, 11:20:51 pm
You lost me bro, i don't know what you want now. I pointed out problems in text, i rewrote that text without those problems, and text didn't end up like the one in your post. What "fiction-writing artistic freedom" do you need for a description of a warehouse? It's not even a Command center. And we (not me for sure) weren't talking about all emails, just building description.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on January 09, 2012, 11:32:08 pm
i mean, your text was brief and concentrated, it covered most points, and all was nice and good, but i still had to read all of it very carefully to find out how, say, assigned soldier equipment is handled.
actually i had to read it twice.
i see the structure as a problem, as in the first post i wrote:
Quote
I would expect item categories and associated security standards (id and name), and it better be formatted as a list or else Maj. LeClerc might be in trouble.
however, real encyclopedia texts also have the structure not so obviously visible, and i cannot say it is bad, but rather a matter of preference.

i hope that clarifies the difference.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Vassilios de Veritas on January 09, 2012, 11:44:12 pm
So you want a simple list because it's hard for you to find things in text?
Quote
The Storage facility is the base's repository for:
*ammunition
*weapons
*other equipment not currently in use
*battlefield vehicles.
???
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on January 10, 2012, 12:06:19 am
lol, yeah, i might have a constant heavy hangover or alzheimer or i might be just tired, and i might have low iq, and aliens might be attacking me or just killing people somewhere else.
therefore i find lists much more clear to find info from, and they are also more routine to write.

there is such format, though, where
1. intro text is brief free-form, preferably one sentence (to get you in the mood).
2. exhaustive details as lists, usually with numerical references (you can find the detail you are looking for).
3. explanatory text can be a bit more verbose free-form (some common sense explanations and ideas).

this is the thing i was trying to do in my own version of the storage facility.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Vassilios de Veritas on January 10, 2012, 12:22:29 am
Oh, i get it.
And it sucks.
 8)
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on January 10, 2012, 01:15:00 am
If Maj. LeClerc wrote like this:
Quote
My mom is spending a lot of time on insignificant trifles. Like looking for scissors. I find this unfair for her that she needs to spend time and be stressed like that. I think if she had a focus point for storing her scissors, like a plastic cup or something, finding scissors would become a no-issue that she would not even notice anymore.
instead of like this (notice how the structure is exactly the same as previously posted):
Quote
A plastic cup is required for my mom to store scissors in, so that the scissors are not lost regularly.
The cup would be a focus point for her to store the scissors after use.
then a good base commander would enforce the text structure by requiring that from this moment onwards, all e-mails will need to follow the previously posted 'plastic cup' example, including the bold.

And it would fit with the formal headings.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: TrashMan on January 10, 2012, 09:29:29 am
Frankly, I'd make a new model for the base.


It just doesn't look like a secure storage facility. The way the base is built limits things.

I'd put shelves and lockers on the walls and in the center of the room a massive armored holding chamber OR a lift to underground storage area.

Alos, a good idea would be to add blocks that cna be used to clsoe off unused entrances. It's still for sensitive areas to have 4 entrances.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Coyote on January 10, 2012, 09:12:56 pm
Being a bit..anal..aren't we?

Descriptions give flavor. You complain the Storage description is too long? Bah.

If anything, the base model could use an update.

+1

I really don't see what the problem is.  Strictly speaking, the storage facility doesn't need a description at all - the name is kind of self-explanatory.  It's a facility, in which you store items.  Since every item takes up storage space, you need one.  That's all you need to know, and it's explained right there in the name.  But just because it doesn't need one doesn't mean it shouldn't have one - and just because it doesn't need to be more than three or four sentences doesn't mean it necessarily should be that brief.  Some people - myself included - actually like reading the minor details about the various facilities, and it's not like the game actually forces you to read the entry at any point, so if you would prefer not to hear about how a storage room is organized or whatever, you could always just not read it.
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: homunculus on January 11, 2012, 03:09:56 am
@Coyote
Oh, trust me, I am not going to go through the same explanation again.

To sum it up:
1) The structure of the text is too chaotic to fit the formal heading.
2) Maj. LeClerc writes his personal opinions like a civilian and therefore appears incompetent for the position (at least compared to what I would expect from military and even just most formal work, and compared to real world arms room SOP).
3) The little info about some minor details that the player might want to check sometimes, is not accessible within 3 seconds, and often it is not there at all. There is at least one piece of wrong info.

But this is getting stale in my opinion (on the positive side, it might develop into a modeling thread  ???), anything else that would be fun to rant about?
Title: Re: Some rant about ufopaedia texts
Post by: Coyote on January 11, 2012, 04:53:58 am
No need, I went over it again myself and, upon second thought, you actually kind of have a point there.  Either way it and some of the other descriptions should also be revised a bit to take into account when they were written - the workshop entry mentions industrial robots even though it was ostensibly written in the 1950s.  I know PHALANX was ahead of its time and all that, but since they were supposedly founded in 1958, and the entry was written in 1958, there's no way they could have had enough time to invent, mass-produce, and implement industrial robotics.

EDIT: Thinking about it, this is a fairly simple rewrite, by shifting some of the information about automated systems and such to the 'Addenda' section pointing out that they were added to the design in later years.  Maybe have the addendum mentioning them being from the 1970s or 80s rather than 2084, since advanced automated systems seem like a logical thing to add to the base workshop as soon as they're available.

EDIT THE SECOND: Actually, the first industrial robots were apparently around by the mid-1950s, so my entire rant is invalid.  Disregard.