Yeah, I use linux... and somehow, the Ufo_2 main-branch I got just now, works better. But I dont really get the difference (both say rev 2952) - could you tell me?
Backtracing the trunk reads at fisrt halt:
#0 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
#1 0x401e9ba2 in sem_post@GLIBC_2.0 () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#2 0x401a9e68 in SDL_SemPost () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0
#3 0x401a9455 in SDL_RunThread () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0
#4 0x401a97cd in SDL_KillThread () from /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0
#5 0x401e5297 in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0
#6 0x402b137e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#7 0x407eabb0 in ?? ()
and at crash
0 0x407fc1bc in Font_Length (font=Error accessing memory address 0xbfecb260: Kein passender Prozess gefunden.
) at gl_font.c:181
Error accessing memory address 0xbfecb258: Kein passender Prozess gefunden.
using "run" with the options wiki suggests, I get a lot more halts and a crash at
#0 0x407fc1bc in Font_Length (font=0x93a39a4 "f_big",
c=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>, width=0x200, height=0x1df)
at gl_font.c:181
#1 0x0807d439 in CL_Sequence2D () at cl_sequence.c:333
#2 0x0808686b in V_RenderView (stereo_separation=0) at cl_view.c:717
#3 0x0807cabd in SCR_UpdateScreen () at cl_scrn.c:732
#4 0x0806f160 in CL_Frame (msec=1746) at cl_main.c:1577
#5 0x080964c9 in Qcommon_Frame (msec=1746) at common.c:1546
#6 0x080ac5e6 in main (argc=10, argv=0xbfdcf3c4) at sys_linux.c:399
hmmmm...