project-navigation
Personal tools

Author Topic: Gameover with only one member of the UN in bad shape?  (Read 3852 times)

Offline SainnQ

  • Cannon Fodder
  • **
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Gameover with only one member of the UN in bad shape?
« on: January 09, 2010, 02:46:17 pm »
Just how low on the rating scale do UN nations need to go before it's a game over?

I've just about every other UN nation happy with my performance except oceania.
Is the game SUPPOSED to gameover with just one UN member nation "giving up" ?

Offline Viento

  • Rookie
  • ***
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: Gameover with only one member of the UN in bad shape?
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2010, 03:59:30 pm »
How far are you in the game?

You can lose because there is too much infection on Earth.
You could have more debts than you are allowed.

Andy

Offline Destructavator

  • Combination Multiple Specialty Developer
  • Administrator
  • PHALANX Commander
  • *****
  • Posts: 1908
  • Creater of Scorchcrafter, knows the zarakites...
    • View Profile
Re: Gameover with only one member of the UN in bad shape?
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2010, 05:12:27 pm »
...And which version of the game are you playing?

The 2.3 development builds are very different from the 2.2.1 release (which is over a year old now), and even different still is 2.2.0 which some people play then come to this forum because they downloaded the game from a third-party site with an older version.

The different versions have somewhat different win/lose conditions.

Edit:  The game also tracks how many civilians get killed, and that can also trigger a lost game, even if nations don't get that upset.

Offline SainnQ

  • Cannon Fodder
  • **
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Gameover with only one member of the UN in bad shape?
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2010, 06:11:02 pm »
...And which version of the game are you playing?

The 2.3 development builds are very different from the 2.2.1 release (which is over a year old now), and even different still is 2.2.0 which some people play then come to this forum because they downloaded the game from a third-party site with an older version.

The different versions have somewhat different win/lose conditions.

Edit:  The game also tracks how many civilians get killed, and that can also trigger a lost game, even if nations don't get that upset.



I'm not dealing with any Infection, I haven't seen any Biolandmass, if such exists.

I'm playing with the 2.2.1 stable build, should I be playing with a different build?

Because as it stands, having only one nation peeved kill my game is utterly retarded.

It would be alot easier if the reasons for a gameover besides you losing all your bases were more obvious :/

Offline Viento

  • Rookie
  • ***
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: Gameover with only one member of the UN in bad shape?
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2010, 06:25:16 pm »
Play 2.3. ;)

2.2.1 is very old. There are tons of interesting features + new weapons + more story in 2.3

Andy

Offline SainnQ

  • Cannon Fodder
  • **
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Gameover with only one member of the UN in bad shape?
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2010, 06:52:04 pm »
Play 2.3. ;)

2.2.1 is very old. There are tons of interesting features + new weapons + more story in 2.3

Andy

Is a downloadable installer available? Or will I have to do a bit of tinkering with code programs to compile alot of stuff?

Offline Viento

  • Rookie
  • ***
  • Posts: 96
    • View Profile
Re: Gameover with only one member of the UN in bad shape?
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2010, 07:18:55 pm »
There is a thread with lots of exes. Problem is that the last complete installer (that you might want to get) was a bit buggy with problems that were quiet unnerving. The bugfix (the last exe) is not a complete installation.

I'm not a real expert, but I would wait for the next full exe, which shouldn't be long.

But perhaps more experiences users can help you better than I can. :)

Andy

Offline SainnQ

  • Cannon Fodder
  • **
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Gameover with only one member of the UN in bad shape?
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2010, 12:23:43 am »
There is a thread with lots of exes. Problem is that the last complete installer (that you might want to get) was a bit buggy with problems that were quiet unnerving. The bugfix (the last exe) is not a complete installation.

I'm not a real expert, but I would wait for the next full exe, which shouldn't be long.

But perhaps more experiences users can help you better than I can. :)

Andy

Looks like I'm stuck with version 2.1 then Hehe.