Development > Artwork

Textures

<< < (2/13) > >>

DuKe2112:
Ok, it is somewhat subtle and since you two didn't notice it, I suppose few people would, but I'm talking about the area I marked red.

It's completely filled with the exact same shade of beige/ocker(how do you call it?) as opposed to the other mountain, whioch is subtly textured.. Also the trees on that side are cropped because of this.
Looks exactly as if you applied a filler with some tollerance.

RudolfoWood:
with this explanation I see it (so I don't see any red marker :-) )
for those who still search: right side the mountain, flowing into the lake

sitters:

--- Quote from: DuKe2112 on December 22, 2008, 05:42:52 pm ---Ok, it is somewhat subtle and since you two didn't notice it, I suppose few people would, but I'm talking about the area I marked red.

It's completely filled with the exact same shade of beige/ocker(how do you call it?) as opposed to the other mountain, whioch is subtly textured.. Also the trees on that side are cropped because of this.
Looks exactly as if you applied a filler with some tollerance.

--- End quote ---

pfffttt... Now I see what you talking about, I'd did not blend the layer correct ( I fix this ). :)


Edit : this is better then ( refresh your page ).

Willem

DuKe2112:
The red marker was on the pic I somehow failed to attach properly.

I know it's a minor detail, but for some reason I catch those imediately.
If I want to be nitpicking, I could say the trees on the right side still don't blend in as well as the left ones do, but that's realy overkill (;

Mattn:
it would be cool if you could upload the source images, too

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page