Technical support > Windows

Win32 Development Binary Installer Links

<< < (10/141) > >>

EchizenR:
Thanks for the explanation. I'll stick with option A for now. If I run into problem experimenting with compiling the program in the future, I'll be relying on your help..:D

Destructavator:
Just FYI to all, I'll attempt to grab a relatively stable SVN snapshot and get it uploaded sometime this weekend, as the last link is a good two weeks old (roughly).

ManicMiner:
Hi,

This is probably a silly question but is it worth doing a "diff" between files contained in the older package and the new one, and host that seperately?

I would use SVN but let's just say the "how to" documentation for it isn't that friendly - if you've done SVN before I guess it's a no-brainer but when I tried it I got a gazillion errors on the download, prompts for credentials and none of that was covered in the docs. It put me off.

If I had the source I might even be able to contribute (I've done more with VB/Fortran/Cobol/C#/ASP.NET etc than with C++ /MFC so there's a small learning curve involved).

BTAxis:
Patching releases isn't worth it. Been there done that.

If you're having issues with SVN, ask about it in the coding forum. It really works quite smoothly for most of us.

Destructavator:
http://www.destructavator.com/public/ufoai-2_3-dev-win32_r20021.zip

I admit I've been busy recently so I didn't really have time to test this one very much, I also think I might be off slightly with the version number, but there it is.

If it turns out this one is very buggy I'll try to upload another one before this weekend.  For those of you who are more interested in simply enjoying a newer version and playing for fun, you might be better off with the previous link, depending on how this one came out (Although none of the builds in this thread are completely stable).

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version