Technical support > Windows

Win32 Development Binary Installer Links

<< < (49/141) > >>

geever:
Revisions from last July. :)

-geever

odie:
Okie, uploading a new version complete built R23897 to filefront.

Its now in compilation (fully uploaded i guess) and takes another abt maybe 2-3 hrs before completion. Hope it will successfully upload by then, if not i will upload via nakido again.

Just being curious, could we just keep this thread or perhaps open a new sticky thread where we just post only:
1) Links for new developers' built.
2) Links for informing about an ongoing built being uploaded (to be added links later).
3) Links for 'patches' somewhat like the ones Muton is building. :)

I will link my next link up in a new thread so look out for that. :)

*Edit*
Here's the new link for update:
UFOAI 2.3 R23897 Developer's Built


PS: This link seemed to be cluttered with all sorta discussions. I propose shifting all downloads out to a diff thread and keeping it a download only thread ok?

*edit*
Started the thread here.

Muton:
 ???

Two topics for the same matter?

I think its ok
as it is now

Comments from people refer directly to a build


based on
http://ufoai.ninex.info/forum/index.php?topic=2830.msg24533#msg24533

ufoai_2.3-dev_23900_diff_win32.exe 24.3MB 2009.04.06
http://www.4shared.com/file/97091501/4f7250b9/ufoai_23-dev_23900_diff_win32.html
http://www.mediafire.com/file/zzmnktzoznc/ufoai_2.3-dev_23900_diff_win32.exe
http://rapidshare.com/files/218174602/ufoai_2.3-dev_23900_diff_win32.exe.html

save and load is working again

odie:
Haha, nope. Just tat this post seemed cluttered liaoz le. :P Alot of well..... digressions here. Lol.

Make a thread just for posting links' purposes - more like a thread of history of compiled svns, continuously.

Maybe this thread can be kept for posting compiling helps that is required>? Dunnoe.

Destructavator:
I agree, this thread is a bit cluttered now.   I was hoping it could be retired when 2.3 came out, then a separate thread for the next (after 2.3) release could be started.

On the other hand, if the links aren't all put into one thread and are broken up a lot in multiple threads, that could get messy.

Quite honestly I don't know what the more advanced features of the software for this forum are, I haven't looked at the docs for simple machines forum much, and I don't know what plug-ins are installed to organize the links better.

Perhaps one of the forum admins could help out here, or at least offer a suggestion...

Edit: Small idea: perhaps the threads with links could be arranged by month, such as "April 2.3 test development build links" - this would also make it easier to find an installer built at a certain time or close to it, rather than hunting through threads and looking at dates of each post.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version