Technical support > Windows
Win32 Development Binary Installer Links
BTAxis:
I use 2.37, so that should be fine. I was just wondering why you can't package radiant, because I don't have any difficulties.
Destructavator:
The next time I build a package I'll post and attach some logs, both the output from codeblocks and the NSIS logs - From that you (or any of the other coders) should be able to see what I'm doing wrong.
EDIT: Never mind, I got it to work now.
Destructavator:
SVN version 19060 has been packaged and is now ready. When uploading is complete, I'll edit this post with a link.
Comments: This version appears, at least on my systems, to be much more stable than the previous build I uploaded, so those who want to try a development build should have better luck with this one. Also, I (finally) got all parts to compile and package correctly, including radiant, so this package is complete. It was created with "windows" as the compile target. Also, FYI this package was made on 32-bit Vista Home Premium, and most likely future builds will also be created this way, at least the ones that I upload. This package came out larger in filesize, as a result it will take longer to upload with my connection.
BTAxis:
You should build windows_debug, really. These are test installers, after all. If people have problems with them, it's best that they can provide as much feedback as possible.
Destructavator:
OK, I'll keep that in mind for future reference, thanks.
EDIT:
http://www.destructavator.com/public/ufoai-2_3-dev-win32_r19060.zip
I know it says 19060, but it might actually be off by one or two revision numbers, give or take.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version