Technical support > Windows

Win32 Development Binary Installer Links

<< < (37/141) > >>

odie:

--- Quote from: BTAxis on March 09, 2009, 01:01:50 pm ---I think it's a good idea, but I really don't like how you added the need for third party software. It's getting to be that whatever you want to do requires you do download additional tools, and that's Bad(tm).

--- End quote ---

Hi BTAxis,

I know how additional 3rd party software meant more configurations.... eg we already use CB, NSIS or even T-SVN for most windows users.

Why not a MD5 checker?

If concerned, Microsoft seemed to have suggested something for windows too:
Forum Discussion

Check out that. :)

PS: Yes, i know it was for something else, but the link for the MD5 checker and stuff are there.
If u were to browse the download link u will see more: More Downloads

BTAxis:
As I said, it's an issue of making the user download stuff from all over the internet. If the tools required were part of the C::B package, for example, it would be better, because that's pretty much a mandatory download in the first place.

Destructavator:
http://files.filefront.com/13460935

Revision 23515.  This one seems rather stable and (relatively) playable.

Wizard^^:
@odie
    I like the idea with MD5 checker. But I think your going about it wrong. Try it more like this.

@BTAxis
    Ok I can see what you mean but how about dropping the md5.exe into the C::B.zip\Codeblocks\MinGW\bin\ its only 28K.
    Or even better a SHA1SUM.

I think a check of some sort is needed, while the list of things need to compile the code is small you could make a dependence pack.
 

s300pmu1:

--- Quote from: Destructavator on March 14, 2009, 01:00:03 am ---This one seems rather stable and (relatively) playable.

--- End quote ---

If it's not a secret, how, exactly?
I'm testing ufoai_2.3-dev_23245_diff_win32, the two real problems are the buy\sell screen (can't easily and reliably change values due to screwed-up up-down controls) and the notorious 2nd floor problem. The critical issue was the latter. Has it (oh, God, please!) been resolved?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version