project-navigation
Personal tools

Author Topic: Who Runs The World  (Read 9016 times)

Offline EchizenR

  • Squad Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 103
    • View Profile
Who Runs The World
« on: June 16, 2008, 06:30:16 am »
Who Runs The World
Why You Need To Know Immediately
By Carolyn Baker
A review of The True Story Of The Bilderberg Group, By Daniel Estulin

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=23926

It is difficult to re-educate people who have been brought up on nationalism to the idea of relinquishing part of their sovereignty to a supra-national body. - Bilderberg Group founder, Prince Bernhard

As a rhetorical question, can someone please explain to me how it is that progressive liberals such as John Edwards and Hillary Clinton, as well as do-gooder humanitarians with multiple social projects ongoing such as the Rockefellers and every Royal House in Europe, can perennially attend Bilderberg meetings apparently knowing that the final objective of this despicable group of hoodlums is a fascist One World Empire? - Daniel Estulin (P.318)~

Daniel Estulin is a Madrid-based journalist and an investigative reporter who took on the daunting and dangerous task of researching the Bildeberg Group, and who offers his findings in The True Story Of The Bilderberg Group, recently published by Trine Day. Equally intriguing as his harrowing tales of being followed and nearly killed on a couple of occasions while working on the book, is the manner in which Estulin connects the dots between the Bilderberg Group, world events, notable politicians and corporate tycoons and the two other secretive monsters of the ruling elite, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission (TC). The project lasted fifteen years and was motivated by Estulin's curiosity about how it is that the mainstream media has never covered in depth the meetings of the Bilderberg Group whose combined wealth exceeds the combined wealth of all U.S. citizens.

What Estulin's book makes clear is that the group, along with the CFR and TC, has become a shadow government whose top priority is to erase the sovereignty of all nation-states and supplant them with global corporate control of their economies under the surveillance of "an electronic global police state." (xv)

The author emphasizes that not all members of the group are "bad" people, and he implies that membership is structured somewhat like concentric circles in a target scheme with in inner core and various levels of relationship between that core and the outer circles of membership. Almost every famous player in politics and finance in the world is a member of one of the three organizations mentioned above, and their political affiliations range from liberal to conservative, for example, George W. Bush, George Soros, Gerald Ford, George McGovern, Jimmy Carter. Of this private club, Estulin says:

    This parallel world remains unseen in the daily struggles of most of humanity, but, believe me, it is there: a cesspool of duplicity and lies and double-speak and innuendo and blackmail and bribery. It is a surreal world of double and triple agents, of changing loyalties, of professional psychotic assassins, brainwashed black ops agents, soldiers of fortune and mercenaries, whose primary sources of income are the dirtiest and most despicable government-run subversive missions-the kind that can never be exposed.(15)

This world, according to Estulin, is so perverse and evil that "it has left an indelible mark on my soul". (16) How not? Because the Bilderberg Group and its two other triplets, the CFR and the TC have set about to loot the entire planet. Their members run the central banks of the world and are poised to control discount rates, money-supply, interest rates, gold prices, and which countries receive or do not receive loans. Membership is by invitation only, many of the earliest members being handpicked, not from right-wing groups but from among none other than the Fabian Socialists who ultimately supported global government.

Another chilling quote Estulin includes is from William Shannon:

    The Bilderbergers are searching for the age of post-nationalism: when we won't have countries, but rather regions of the Earth surrounded by Universal values. That is to say, a global economy; one World government (selected rather than elected) and a universal religion. To assure themselves of reaching these objectives, the Bilderbergers focus on a 'greater technical approach' and less awareness on behalf of the general public.

THE BILDERBERG BAPTISM OF BILL CLINTON

In 1991 Bill Clinton attended the Bilderberg Conference in Baden-Baden where Estulin asserts that he was "anointed" to the U.S. presidency, and shortly thereafter he took an unexpected, unannounced trip to Moscow. It appears, says Estulin, that he was sent there to get his KGB student-era, anti-Vietnam war files "buried" before he announced his candidacy for president which happened some two-and-a-half months later. Today, Clinton is a member of all three groups: Bilderberg, CFR, and TC. Hillary Clinton is a member of the Bilderberg Group.

Estulin points out that "almost all of the presidential candidates for both parties have belonged to at least one of these organizations, many of the U.S. congressmen and senators, most major policy-making positions, especially in the field of foreign relations, much of the press, most of the leadership of the CIA, FBI, IRS, and many of the remaining governmental organizations in Washington. CFR members occupy nearly all White House cabinet positions."(80) When one considers that most prominent members of mainstream media are also members of what Edith Kermit Roosevelt, granddaughter of Theodore Roosevelt called "this legitimate Mafia", how can we assert that Americans obtain their news from independent sources?

For example, The News Hour with Jim Leher is the cornerstone of PBS's programming. Leher is a CFR member, and when one examines the funding of the news hour by: Archer Daniels Midland (ADM) whose chairman Dwayne Andreas was a member of the Trilateral Commission; Pepsico, whose CEO Indra Krishnamurthy Nooyi is a Bilderberger and TC Executive Committee member; and Smith Barney which is interlocked with Citigroup, a global financial services company that is a member of the Bilderberg Group, the CFR, and the TC, what kind of "news" should one expect from Leher's News Hour? Consider also that many of the journalists on the News Hour: Paul Gigot, David Gergen, William Kristol, and William Safire are members of one or more of the three groups. (153)

Likewise, when we consider the membership in one or more of these groups of almost every American president since the inception of these organizations, we can no longer pretend that any Democratic or Republican presidential candidate offers the American people an alternative to ruling elite global hegemony.

In fact, Estulin's research reveals that "the Council on Foreign Relations creates and delivers psycho-political operations by manipulating people's reality through a 'tactic of deception', placing Council members on both sides of an issue. The deception is complete when the public is led to believe that its own best interests are being served while the CFR policy is being carried out."(117)

And what happens if the "anointed ones" become too autonomous? One chapter in the book, "The Watergate Con-Game", answers that question. In it Estulin suggests that Richard Nixon was set up by the Council on Foreign Relations of which he was a member because of his insubordination and unwillingness to submit to the shadow government. Presumably, Nixon's demise was carefully crafted to demonstrate to subsequent Chief Executives the price they would pay for disregarding the agenda of those who anointed them.

THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW

In the book's final pages, Estulin's research waxes increasingly relevant to the present moment in history. He asks: "Why would David Rockefeller and other U.S. Trilateralists, Bilderbergers and the CFR members want to dismantle the industrial might of the United States?" (184). He then launches into a summary of the economic history of the twentieth century and makes one of the most powerful statements of the entire book: "What we have witnessed from this 'cabal' is the gradual collapsing of the U.S. economy that began in the 1980s." (187)

In case you haven't noticed, this "gradual collapse of the U.S. economy" is no longer gradual, and what Estulin is asserting confirms a great deal of the assertions made by Catherine Austin Fitts that the current housing bubble explosion/credit crunch/mortgage meltdown has its roots in the 1980s. James Howard Kunstler has also written recently in his blog entitled "Shock and Awe" that the great American yard sale has begun. In other words, as an engineered economic meltdown drives hundreds of thousands and eventually millions of businesses and individuals into bankruptcy, key players in the Big Three ruling elite organizations can buy up the train wreck left behind for pennies on the dollar-a brilliant fast-track strategy for owning the world.

In the final months of 2007 we are witnessing the stupendous success of the Big Three's strategy for planetary economic hegemony as the cacophony of their carefully engineered global economic cataclysm reverberates across America and around the world. It was never about buyers who didn't read the fine print when taking out liar loans. It was always about silver-tongued, ruling elite politicians and central bankers, anointed by the shadow government, who ultimately and skillfully stole and continue to steal governments from people and replace them with transnational corporations.

No one could have said it better than David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, a Bilderberg member and board member of the Council On Foreign Relations in his Memoirs:

    Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure-one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

If you want to know who really runs the world and the lengths to which they will go to establish their globalist hegemony, you must read Estulin's well-documented The True Story of The Bilderberg Group.
« Last Edit: June 16, 2008, 06:32:48 am by EchizenR »

Offline Nevasith

  • Rookie
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2008, 12:20:27 am »
sorry, but the conspiracy plots are laugh worthy to be delicate. I've even met the theory, that the world is ruled by the hidden group of Satanists.
The process of connecting countries is a natural thing- countries have always been only an excuse for the ones who are in the government to keep the controll.

What i am asking is- what difference will it make weather you are ruled by a so called your government or a supreme world directorate? As long as its not a religious fanatics or similar group that tend to break human rights

Offline BTAxis

  • Administrator
  • PHALANX Commander
  • *******
  • Posts: 2607
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2008, 12:30:58 am »
No, even if it WAS them. As long as they don't bother us, why should we care?

Offline Nevasith

  • Rookie
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2008, 12:41:04 am »
thats what i was saying! As long as i feel good and unbothered i dont care who rules

Offline EchizenR

  • Squad Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 103
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2008, 06:19:43 am »
Well, who cares, you might ask. When surveillance societies are being a permanent fixture in our society, Big Brother is indeed watching. And I'm sure you'll have heard of the recent FISA "capitulation" where Congress is going to give telecom companies immunity from the law as they spy on Americans, which one law expert has said to be the "evisceration of the 4th Amendment" (http://rawstory.com/rawreplay/?p=1319). When laws like HR 1955, the "Violent Radicalisation and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act" define terrorism as "violence, or force" (What's the difference between those two? Well, technically, force could mean using logical argument to influence... see this for a detailed explanation- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wJsovPRTEM), potentially criminalising dissent. Wasn't America founded to protect rights such as this? Or have you all forgotten your Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights? Even if you disregard conspiracy, can you deny that present governments are not of the people and for the people?

Nevasith said something about breaking human rights, you don't need to look to Guantanamo or even Abu Graib, just look at cases where police tase people for non-compliance (For a continually updated list- (http://www.informationliberation.com/?category=Tyranny/Police%20State). And thats "torture" according to the UN.

As to the world being controlled by satanists, thats quite unbelievable, but lets if you're a Christian and have read Revelation, that's a whole different matter, which would take quite a whole to explain. But a conspiracy to establish world government, or the much-ridiculed New World Order conspiracy? Thats a fact. Globalisation COULD be a natural phenomena, developing as nations strive towards their own aim. But this is not the case. Consider the following,

"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."
-Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976

"The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole."

"We cannot leap into world government in one quick step [...] The precondition for eventual globalisation- genuine globalisation- is progressive
regionalisation, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units."
- Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1995

« Last Edit: June 21, 2008, 02:18:13 pm by EchizenR »

Offline EchizenR

  • Squad Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 103
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2008, 06:22:41 am »
EDIT: (Continued)

And finally,

"The house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than the top down.  It will look like a great booming, buzzing confusion
[...] but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault."
- Richard N Gardner, April 1974, (A Council on Foreign Relations publications) Foreign Affairs

In elite circles, world government is being discussed openly, however, without the knowledge of the public, because it would mean the ultimate
centralisation of power, which is antithetical to a democracy, WTF that form of government doesn't even exist. In the first place, you people in America
are supposed to have a Republican form of government,

"Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide."
- John Adams

The Republican is the only form of government which is not eternally at open or secret war with the rights of mankind - Thomas Jefferson

But now, you have a fascist government, waiting to be merged into a totalitarian world government. And but "fascist", consider this quote from Mussolini
on fascism:

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -Benito Mussolini

For years, a core of elites have been planning, without the knowledge of their citizens, the merging of countries into regional blocs, starting with
the EEC in 1957 with the Treaty of Rome. What started as an economic union, ultimately became a political union, which is the "progressive regionalism"
which Brezeinski was talking about. In the US, its the same under NAFTA and the SPP. As Henry Kissinger said, NAFTA "is not a conventional trade agreement
 but the architecture of a new international system".

I wonder if any of you have heard of the Transatlantic Policy Network? I doubt not. Already this private think-tank (which produces stupid ideas), has
(without mention from the mainstream news) gotten congressional support from Congress to work towards a US-EU common market by 2015. As the North American
Union takes shape, it seems that it's undergoing simultaneous merger into a global entity.

After all these, can anyone doubt the deliberate secrecy that conspiracy is defined as? What about the whole history of government sponsored terrorism?
9/11? Building 7? I'm sure you've heard of all these issues, don't be kept from the truth by the Orwellian 'crimestop' and 'doublethink'. In the first
place, official versions are lies meant to keep the majority happily sedated, harmless to the ruling establishment.

Last example, consider the Cold War. For decades, communism was supposed to be the archenemy of capitalism and the American people. However, it was Woodrow
Wilson that authorised Trotsky's passport to go to Russia and ferment revolution. As documented by Antony C Sutton, Wall Street bankers financed and
lobbied to support the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. Later, US firms continually built up the Soviet military-industrial complex, through WWII (Lend-lease,
but thats understandable)...BUT why the f*** did the US give Stalin nuclear blueprints ?! (http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/jordan/01.html) Later,
James Roosevelt, son of FDR, admitted that his father made the decision to share the nuclear bomb with the Soviets. And throughout the Cold War, even
though they were supposed to be enemies, the US Govt gave tacit approval to firms who aided in the built up of the Soviet military and even gave them MIRV
(1 missile, multiple warheads) technology! Go read Antony Sutton's "The Best Enemies Money can Buy" for more on this subject.

So conspiracy is everywhere, throughtout history, in the business world (Why are there anti-trust laws, and more recently, congressional investigations
into the Commodities Future Trading Commission on speculation that is driving up oil prices- right oil shortage is BS!), so why do people think the
political realm is immune from conspiracies?

To end, I would like to provide a clip that I hope would change your mindsets- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYyzzTXHRSc

And remember,

"Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity."
- Marshall McLuhan

Don't be their bit***s by remaining ignorant.

« Last Edit: June 21, 2008, 02:30:01 pm by EchizenR »

Offline Nevasith

  • Rookie
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2008, 12:34:31 pm »
why it is evil (i mean establishing the world wide government)
I dont live in the states, but i guess its the consequence of electing republicans- radical parties always tend to restrict human freedom.
In Poland now, we have to choose between two evils - radical pro catholic party that will put bugs on phones, read letters and limit whatever is possible and so called liberal - which will sell the country to the rich corporations.
You say about limited freedom, but ive seen a picture photo taken on the street - there was George Bush and Adolf Hitler with a comment "same shit- different asshole" If you did such a thing with the president or prime minister in poland youd most likely end up in jail. Maybe with a small sentence of dew years (lets say 3) but still

The worldwide government itself is not a bed idea. What could be done can be evil- but doesnt have to be that way. Its like the knife- you can use it to make food - or slit a throat

Offline BTAxis

  • Administrator
  • PHALANX Commander
  • *******
  • Posts: 2607
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2008, 12:35:48 pm »
* Why can't I post the rest of my reply??!!! Its long, but such a topic deserves a long answer.

It's an issue of the forum with special characters in some character sets. It affects some people. You should always make sure to preview any long post you make to avoid this sort of thing.

Offline EchizenR

  • Squad Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 103
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2008, 02:15:23 pm »
It's an issue of the forum with special characters in some character sets. It affects some people. You should always make sure to preview any long post you make to avoid this sort of thing.

Then how can I present my whole reply?

I dont live in the states, but i guess its the consequence of electing republicans- radical parties always tend to restrict human freedom.

The worldwide government itself is not a bed idea. What could be done can be evil- but doesnt have to be that way. Its like the knife- you can use it to make food - or slit a throat

Republican, democrat, its the same people that are paying them.

"Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely." -Lord Acton

Besides, its not like this is a recent happening. A one-world government has be planned hundreds of years ago. Its just that recently the technology has been developed that would allow ease of control. And so, the history of the past few decades, maybe even centuries, have been geared towards establishing such a system. Take government-sponsored terrorism for instance, if one researches it carefully, the conclusion is that the only terrorists in the world are the governments that condemn them. Governments carry out terror attacks, the people demand action, and the government is able to push through their agenda as part of the solution. Problem, reaction, solution. For more, watch the below documentary.

TerrorStorm- video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8136133221213939183

« Last Edit: June 21, 2008, 02:30:30 pm by EchizenR »

Offline BTAxis

  • Administrator
  • PHALANX Commander
  • *******
  • Posts: 2607
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2008, 02:26:10 pm »
Then how can I present my whole reply?

Take out the offending characters.

Offline EchizenR

  • Squad Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 103
    • View Profile
Re: Who Runs The World
« Reply #10 on: June 25, 2008, 11:19:39 am »
Thanks. Don't get a chance to express views like this very often. Whole reply is now up, although in two parts.