Development > Artwork

Renders

<< < (14/42) > >>

sitters:

Damn winter, I am not an movie producer. ;)
Thats a week rendering time.

I make more short clips, then it can be composed to an movie by Destructavator.

Here I have corrected the clipping of the moon.

http://www.md2.sitters-electronics.nl/Models2/moon5.avi


Willem

Winter:

--- Quote from: sitters on December 01, 2007, 09:02:43 pm ---Damn winter, I am not an movie producer. ;)
Thats a week rendering time.

I make more short clips, then it can be composed to an movie by Destructavator.

Here I have corrected the clipping of the moon.

http://www.md2.sitters-electronics.nl/Models2/moon5.avi


Willem

--- End quote ---

Only ideas, mate, only ideas. ;)

But give me a professional animation team and I'll rock your damned socks off!

Regards,
Winter

Winter:

--- Quote from: sitters on December 01, 2007, 09:02:43 pm ---Damn winter, I am not an movie producer. ;)
Thats a week rendering time.

I make more short clips, then it can be composed to an movie by Destructavator.

Here I have corrected the clipping of the moon.

http://www.md2.sitters-electronics.nl/Models2/moon5.avi


Willem

--- End quote ---

This is near-perfect. The only thing I can still comment on is the conflict between the UFO shadows and the lighting of the moon. In order for the shadows to fall on the moon the way they do, the bottom half of the moon would have to be in complete shadow. A bit like so, only better drawn:



Regards,
Winter

sitters:
The light cant be wrong, because i uses one parallel light, for the moon and the carriers.

It is just where the light is ( or sun ), and when I place it the way you like then the carriers are barely lighted, only from beside.
The moon is an sphere, and catching a lot of light, but the carrier is relative small.

Willem


And with this (But give me a professional animation team and I'll rock your damned socks off!) then the animation team is rocking your socks of.
We all know, how the good SciFi movies, with good specials looks. :P

Winter:

--- Quote from: sitters on December 01, 2007, 10:27:07 pm ---The light cant be wrong, because i uses one parallel light, for the moon and the carriers.

It is just where the light is ( or sun ), and when I place it the way you like then the carriers are barely lighted, only from beside.
The moon is an sphere, and catching a lot of light, but the carrier is relative small.

Willem

--- End quote ---

It is actually wrong, not because of any fault on your part, but because light works differently when the light source is 147 million kilometres away. The way it is now, the light appears to be coming from both directly ahead of the carriers and from directly above. If it was accurately modelled with the sun in the same direction as suggested by the shading on the moon, then the Carrier shadows wouldn't show up at the very top of the moon, but some way down it several seconds after the Carriers pass the moon.

Regards,
Winter

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page